It Doesn’t Have to Sting to be Good 

Canada Wood Nettle (Laportea canadensis) seedhead. This is the host plant for butterflies and moths. The stinging hairs are very clear in this image – they’re often not as visible when you’re wearing shorts in the forest.

What do Admirals, Commas, Question Marks and Tortoiseshells all have in common? No, it’s not a love letter written by a shipwrecked seafarer on a desert island.  These are all butterflies that are commonly found in the southern Great Lakes region and they, along with a few interesting moths, all use members of the nettle family (Urticaceae) as host plants. 

Many of us are familiar with that not-so-lovely burning sensation when we inadvertently brush a bare leg or an arm against some Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica).  This happens because the stems and leaves are covered with a lot of tiny, brittle, needle-like hairs called trichomes that easily break off when touched. At the base of these hairs is a potent mix of histamine, acetylcholine, serotonin and formic acid. And it is this chemical mixture that provides the stinging sensation that can last anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours, depending on your sensitivity level and the size of the dose you get.  

Stinging Nettle is not native to our region – it is naturally found in Europe, Asia and North Africa. Fortunately, we have several members of Urticaceae that are native to the southern Great Lakes region that we can grow in our gardens as host plants, and some of these are even non-stinging if you really don’t want to get stung.  

Nettles and Relatives in the Garden 

Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) 

Let’s start with the non-native Stinging Nettle. You COULD choose to grow this though personally I find it pops up unwanted in my garden without any help. (Apparently it makes a great cooked green, tasting a lot like spinach and loaded with vitamins A and C – the sting is removed with cooking – but always read up on the potential side effects before eating any wild plants). If you really want this plant, consider growing it in containers to help prevent its spread as it grows vigorously from rhizomes and can quickly overtake a garden. Deadheading can reduce the likelihood of seeds, which can remain dormant in the soil for decades. 

This plant typically grows from 3-7 feet tall and 1-3 feet wide. It thrives in full sun, but will also tolerate a fair bit of shade (in my garden, it happily grows in full shade under large walnut trees). It’s not fussy about soil type and likes anything from very moist to relatively dry soils. 

Canada Wood Nettle (Laportea canadensis) 

There are many similarities between our native Canada Wood Nettle and Stinging Nettle – including the sting they both give when you brush against them. One of the easiest ways to tell the two apart is that Canada Wood Nettle has alternate leaves whereas the leaves of Stinging Nettle are opposite. Also, Canada Wood Nettle prefers moist, shady woodlands and doesn’t like hot, dry sunny sites.  

Canada Wood Nettle grows 2-4 feet tall with a 1-3 foot spread. It will tolerate deep shade if sufficiently moist. Self-fertile, separate male and female flowers are inconspicuous and appear in the summer. Male flowers are shorter, less than 1/8″ across, with 5 white to green petals. Female flowers are loose and lacy with 4 green sepals that resemble curly leaves in longer clusters. These are clustered at the top of the plant. Like Stinging Nettle, this plant spreads readily by rhizomes.  

False Nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica) 

Also sometimes referred to as Smallspike False Nettle, Swamp Nettle or Bog Hemp, this is our stingless native. It has opposite leaves (like Stinging Nettle) and gets up to 5 feet tall in full to partly sunny, damp to average soils.  

Because it doesn’t have stinging hairs, this is a great choice as a filler plant in moist, shady gardens as it remains green and leafy well into the fall. 

Clearweed (Pilea pumila) 

One of my personal favourites in the nettle family, Clearweed gets its name from its smooth, translucent stems, which to me are almost jewel-like. Also called Canada (or Canadian) Clearweed, Dwarf Clearweed, Coolweed and Green-fruited Clearweed, this short(ish) cousin of nettles ranges from 6 inches to 2 feet tall – in my southwestern Ontario garden in sandy loam soil it usually tops out at around 1 foot in height. It prefers part shade, but I’ve seen it growing in full sun to full shade as long as the soil is at least moderately moist. Like False Nettle, it also has no stinging hairs.    

A Note on Urticaceae 

All the plants listed here are wind pollinated, so you won’t see much pollinator activity around them.  And all are purportedly edible, though with varying degrees of palatability. Some sources claim, for example, that neither Clearweed nor False Nettle are edible, while others suggest they are. If you decide to try some on your plate, do your research first. For me, I’ll just leave all mine for the caterpillars.  

Spicebush and Tiger Swallowtail Butterflies 

This month’s article is the second in a series of articles on host plants for butterflies and moths that I began last month. I started with two common butterflies in my garden, the Black Swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes) and the Giant Swallowtail (Papilio cresphontes). In today’s article I will look at two more swallowtail butterflies that I regularly see in my southwestern Ontario garden. As before, I will provide photos of the butterfly and its caterpillar (and egg, if I have a photo), as well as photos of some of its host plants along with some basic facts about growing these plants.  

Spicebush Swallowtail (Papilio troilus) 

Often (and easily) confused with last month’s Black Swallowtail, the Spicebush Swallowtail is a rare visitor in my garden, despite my having two large Spicebushes, a couple of Tulip Trees and a Sassafras tree, all of which are its host plants in the southern Great Lakes region. 

Like the Giant Tiger swallowtail, the young caterpillar of the Spicebush Swallowtail looks a lot like a bird dropping, thus discouraging predation by birds. However, as it outgrows its skin and gets larger and larger, it takes on a bright green colour and develops two large eye-spots, supposedly mimicking a snake. In its final instar, it tends to be bright yellow or orange, sometimes even a reddish orange colour. 

The adult Spicebush Swallowtail nectars on a wide range of flowering plants, including asters, milkweeds, Purple Coneflower, and thistles. It is a large butterfly, with a wingspan of 31/to 51/2”.  

Northern Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) 

  • Lindera benzoin, sometimes called Wild Allspice, is a shrub in the Laurel family. It is typically found in moist, rich forests as an understory shrub, growing from 5-15 feet tall (in my gardens, the height seems directly correlated to average soil moisture). This lovely shrub has early spring yellow flowers around the same time as the non-native – and useless to our butterflies – Forsythia. You supposedly need a male and a female plant to get fruit, but both of my shrubs produce berries yet I have yet to find another Spicebush in my neighbourhood! 

  • If you have part to full shade and moist to average soil, this shrub is a must for your garden. The leaves have a lovely spicy fragrance when crushed, and a tea can be made from the twigs and leaves. Both green (unripe) and red (ripe) berries offer distinct tastes: green berries are sharp, lemony, and peppery, while red berries are sweeter, reminiscent of allspice. The berries can be used fresh or dried, with drying intensifying the flavor and prolonging their shelf life. 

Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) 

  • Liriodendron tulipifera is a magnificent tree – in the forest it grows tall and straight and can reach heights of 60-90 feet. Open-grown, it makes a wonderful shade tree.  But probably its most notable feature is the large, yellow and green tulip-like flowers it produces each spring.  

  • Tulip Trees prefer full or partial sun, mesic conditions, and fertile soil that is loamy or silty. It is a fast grower and can produce flowers in less than 10 years. (In my mesic, silt-loam soil in part shade, my tulip tree reached about 40 feet tall and 18” across (dbh) in less than 15 years!) But, as with most fast-growing trees, the branches are a bit brittle and susceptible to ice and windstorm damage. 

Sassafras (Sassafras albidum) 

  • A medium-sized tree (50-65 feet tall), Sassafras albidum is probably best known for it historic use for flavouring root beer. However, its use for this commercially was banned when it was shown that large doses of the active ingredient (safrole) caused liver damage and was linked to some cancers.  
  • The leaf shape can be quite variable, from a simple leaf to a “mitten” to a “trident”, and the leaf shape and their beautiful red and gold fall colours make this an interesting specimen in the garden. Like the Spicebush, this tree is typically dioecious, having male and female flowers on separate trees. This is a colony forming tree and, if allowed to grow unchecked, will send up root sprouts and soon form a grove.  

  • It will grow in just about any loose, moist soil but it needs full sunlight for good growth. It seems to be a favourite of the invasive Japanese beetles in my garden, which often do a lot of cosmetic damage to the leaves, though it hasn’t seemed to impact the health of the tree. 

Eastern Tiger Swallowtail (Papilio glaucus) 

The Eastern Tiger Swallowtail is the most common swallowtail butterfly in my garden, but they are quite territorial so I usually only see one resident – any other Tiger Swallowtails that pass through are harassed until they move on. They will even chase off other species of butterfly, and I once saw one chase after a sparrow (a move I thought rather brave – or foolish – as the bird could have quickly turned the tables).  

These large (up to 51/4” wingspan) bright yellow butterflies are hard to miss. Their preferred host plant is the Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), but they will also use the Hop Tree (Ptelea trifoliata). If neither of these is available, they have also been known to use cherry trees (such as the Wild Black Cherry – Prunus serotina) and ash trees (Fraxinus spp.). 

Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) – see above 

Hop Tree (Ptelea trifoliata 

  • The Hop Tree goes by many common names – Wafer Ash, Stinking Ash, Swamp Devil’s Bit, Water Ash, Wing Seed and even Shrubby Trefoil. This is a small tree/ large shrub, getting 15-20 feet tall and spreading just as wide. It likes just about any kind of soil in full sun to full shade. It even makes a good potted shrub – just make sure your pot is large enough. The Hop Tree is monoecious, often producing male, female, and perfect (bisexual) flowers on the same shrub. 
  • The first time my Hop Tree flowered (in June), I couldn’t figure out where the lovely fragrance was coming from. Once I did, I regularly altered my path so I could come near the blossoms for a whiff of perfume. But it must be one of those fragrances (like the taste of Cilantro for some) that you either love or hate – how else would it get the common name Stinking Ash?!? 

Further Reading

If you’d like to know more about the differences in our Swallowtail butterflies, there are two great sites with lots of comparison images at https://www.butterfliesathome.com/swallowtail-butterflies.htm and https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=684652250358733&id=100064418930419&set=a.558096469680979.

The Host with the Most – Hosting Moths and Butterflies in Your Garden 

Giant Swallowtail nectaring on Echinacea purpurea (Purple Condeflower).

Who doesn’t love to see a majestic butterfly flit through the garden, alighting on newly opened flower buds for a sip of nectar, then watch as it explores what else you have to offer. If you’re really lucky, you may even get to see it lay an egg or two on the underside of a leaf. Although most folks do know by now the relationship between Monarch Butterflies and Milkweed, surprisingly I met someone a few weeks ago that saw monarchs nectaring on his Purple Coneflower and wondered why he never saw them laying eggs on it! He didn’t realize that they ONLY lay their eggs on members of the Milkweed family. 

Monarchs aren’t the only butterflies (or moths, for that matter) that have very particular tastes. Although some species of Lepidoptera are generalists – meaning their caterpillars will eat many different kinds of plants, what a lot of folks don’t realize is that most butterflies and moths do not lay their eggs on just any plant. They require very specific species of plants if they are to successfully multiply their numbers.  

This month’s article will be the first in what I hope will be a series of articles about host plants – which plants host which butterflies and/or moths – and a brief description of what you need to grow those plants to make your yard a nursery for many beautiful butterflies and moths. I shall start with my own favourite butterflies, the swallowtails. 

Swallowtail Butterflies 

In the southern Great Lakes region, we are home to 9 species of Swallowtail Butterfly, according to Rick Cavasin  (https://www.ontariobutterflies.ca/families/Papilionidae) one of which – the Midsummer Tiger Swallowtail – he indicates has only recently been described. In today’s article I will cover the two most common ones that I regularly see in my southwestern Ontario garden. I will provide photos of the butterfly and its caterpillar, as well as photos of some of its host plants along with some basic facts about growing these plants. Over the coming months I will look at a few more of the swallowtails, then perhaps go on to some of our other butterflies, if sufficient interest exists. 

Black Swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes 

This black beauty is a challenge to photograph because it rarely sits still. Even while nectaring its wings are constantly aflutter. The caterpillar of this butterfly feeds on plants in the carrot family. Many vegetable gardeners are accustomed to seeing it on their dill and parsley plants, and even on their carrots or celery, and if you don’t mind sharing your produce, this is a great way to attract them. 

The native host plants for Black Swallowtail Butterflies include Golden Alexander (Zizia aurea), Cow Parsnip (Heracleum maximum), Purplestem Angelica (Angelica atropurpurea), Sweet Cicely (Osmorhiza claytonia) and Canadian Honewort (Cryptotaenia canadensis). 

Golden Alexander (Zizia aurea) 

  • Zizia aurea is a full to part sun perennial that likes moist to dry, sand to clay soils. It is an early flowering plant in the garden, with blooms starting in early May and often blooming right through to the end of June. (On a personal note – the first year I grew just a single Golden Alexander plant, I had 7 Black Swallowtail caterpillars on it!) 

Cow Parsnip (Heracleum maximum) 

  • Heracleum maximum is the tallest member of the carrot family in North America, often reaching heights of 6-8 feet. It is a relative of Wild Parsnip and Giant Hogweed, and like those plants its sap can cause sun rashes or blisters. It grows in full to part sun, in just about any moist but well drained soil. 

Purplestem or Great Angelica (Angelica atropurpurea) 

  • Angelica atropurpurea is another giant in the garden, often getting up to 7 feet tall or more. This short-lived perennial likes full to part sun and wet to moist clay or loamy soil, or sandy soil with lots of decaying organic matter.  As with Cow Parsnip, if you choose to grow this plant be careful to avoid getting the sap on your skin. 

Sweet Cicely (Osmorhiza claytonii), Aniseroot (O. longistylis) 

  • Osmorhiza claytonia and O. longistylis are plants for full to part shade. They tolerate most soil types and like average moisture soils. They get about 2 feet tall and bloom in May and June.   

Canadian Honewort (Cryptotaenia canadensis) 

  • Another shade plant, Cryptotaenia canadensis, starts flowering in June and can continue right through to September, and though its flowers are quite small and delicate they often put on a lovely show because of the sheer number of blossoms. This perennial can get up to 2 or even 3 feet tall in average moisture, rich, loamy soil. 

Giant Swallowtail (Papilio cresphontes 

The Giant Swallowtail gets it common name for a good reason – with a wingspan up to 4½ inches (113 mm) – it is the largest butterfly in Canada. Its caterpillar, unlike the colourful caterpillar of the Black Swallowtail (which the uninitiated often confuse for a Monarch caterpillar), looks exactly like a bird dropping on a leaf. Its disguise is so convincing that these caterpillars don’t even bother to hide under the leaf. You will almost always find them sitting on the top of the leaf, as if the bird had just pooped and flown on. 

The Giant Swallowtail’s host plants are mostly members of the citrus family – the leaves of orange, lemon, lime and grapefruit trees. Fortunately, we have two species that it uses here in the southern Great Lakes region – Hop Tree and Northern Prickly-ash (both of which member of the citrus family). The fact that Prickly Ash is related to oranges is obvious as anyone who has tasted the berries can tell you – it’s like biting into concentrated orange rind. 

Hop Tree (Ptelea trifoliata 

  • The Hop Tree goes by many common names – Wafer Ash, Stinking Ash, Swamp Devil’s Bit, Water Ash, Wing Seed and even Shrubby Trefoil. This is a small tree/ large shrub, getting 15-20 feet tall and spreading just as wide. It likes just about any kind of soil in full sun to full shade. It even makes a good potted shrub – just make sure your pot is large enough. The Hop Tree is monoecious, often producing male, female, and perfect (bisexual) flowers on the same shrub. 

  • The first time my Hop Tree flowered (in June), I couldn’t figure out where the lovely fragrance was coming from. Once I did, I regularly altered my path so I could come near the blossoms for a whiff of perfume. But it must be one of those fragrances (like the taste of Cilantro for some) that you either love or hate – how else would it get the common name Stinking Ash?!? 

Northern Prickly-ash (Zanthoxylum americanum) 

  • Northern Prickly-ash is a very thorny shrub that can get 15-20 feet tall, though the only place I’ve seen it in the wild (the alvars of Prince Edward County, near Kingston, Ontario) the shrubs were typically around just 5-7 feet high. Not a great choice for a small yard as it can spread aggressively by root suckers, but these can be controlled by either pruning them as they appear, or by planting the shrub in a barrel sunk into the ground.  

  • Prickly-ash does best in full sun, in well drained, average soils. It produces small, inconspicuous green flowers in the spring, but these are beautifully aromatic and attract many bees. Even the leaves have a lemony smell when crushed. In late summer, the fruit ripens to a reddish orange. Another common name for this plant is Toothache Plant, because eating the berries will numb your mouth, but you will need both a male and a female plant to get berries. ` 

Next time: Eastern Tiger Swallowtail and Spicebush Swallowtail 

Of Curves and Optical Illusions

A few weeks ago I posted on social media that I was going to slow down in the number of articles I posted to my website. This was due to some ongoing health problems and because my schedule has become increasingly busy with talks, book signings and trying to work on Volume 2 of the Gardener’s Guide to Native Plants of the Southern Great Lakes Region.  There just don’t seem to be enough hours in a day to get it ALL done. I was blown away by the level of support I received over my decision – your kindness has been extremely gratifying – even though it’s made my decision to cut back a tad more difficult. 

I asked what it was you’d like to see me continue with, since I could no longer do everything, and one of the suggestions a long-time friend made was that I should write an article about (to paraphrase her) “how I designed my gardens to make them look so nice”. This is an attempt to answer that. 

For starters, I’m extremely lucky to live in Ridgetown, Ontario, a small town in the heart of Canada’s Carolinian Zone. The soil is a rich sandy loam and there’s a good 6’ elevation drop from front to back, meaning I have high and dry, low and moist all in one yard. I also have several large sugar maples (and have planted several other trees) so I have full shade to full sun, and everything in between. And to top it all, my property is a double lot (110’ wide by 220’ deep) with a tiny (25’X27’) war-time bungalow that is located so close to the front of the property that if I ever need to replace my front step, I can’t. It’s actually on city property. So that gives me a HUGE canvas to work with. 

Ridgetown – located in the heard of the Carolinian Life Zone of southwestern Ontario is an awesome place to garden. Base map courtesy of https://inthezonegardens.ca/ontario/

When I bought the property in 2004, other than a few non-native forsythia, a beauty bush, and a lovely saucer magnolia in the back yard, it was basically a bare lawn. I had just started a new job, and I didn’t have a lot of time to garden in the first couple of years, so I started small. I planted a few shrubs in what felt like strategic locations, and a couple of trees. Most of these had to be relocated within the first 2-3 years as I got a better feel for the lay of the land and a vision started to materialize. Don’t worry if you don’t get it right the first time. Plants move – usually pretty easily. 

Needless to say, over the next 15 years, the flower beds grew in number and size as I became more comfortable with the yard. But so far none of this discusses the principles that guided my design. 

For starters, I have no formal training in landscape design. But I am a keen observer of nature, and I have always been fascinated with optical illusions. And my garden designs use both of these interests to the extent that it is possible.  

First off – nature does not produce straight lines. Things flow, in curves and meanders, in nature. This is probably the first rule of design for me. My flower beds are all laid out using a garden hose to mark nice, curved edges (making sure the curves aren’t too tight – I still have to get a lawnmower around the edges).  

But, in my opinion, there IS a place for a few straight edges – especially near buildings. To me these add a bit of contrast, and can help transition the “box” of the building into the garden space.  

And nature doesn’t grow short plants in the front and put the tall ones at the back, either. Instead, she tends to grow plants of similar height together. (This could be as much a factor of tall plants shading out the shorter ones as anything). So my gardens tend to be tall plants, or short plants, or mid-height plants, in their respective beds. But, as with so much in my yard, this is not a hard and fast rule and I do break it often. 

Then there’s the optical illusions. In my yard there are a couple of vantage points that I have chosen as the “viewing locations” for the yard. Because my yard is over 200’ deep, and because it slopes from front to back, I design my beds and pathways to exaggerate this depth. The simplest way is to make the grass pathways between beds get slightly narrower as they go to the back of the lot. This gives a much greater sense of depth and distance than what I actually have.  

To emphasize this, when I built my 10’X20’ garden shed, I put it in the back corner of the yard. But I made the decision to build it with only a 7’ eaves instead of the traditional 8’. This makes the shed look long (and thus large) but the low profile makes it look further away.  

The other thing I incorporate into my design is mystery. From no one location can you see the entire yard. There are “surprise” flower beds, or a hidden gem of a specimen plant, tucked into corners, blocked by beds of tall plants or shrubs, and pathways that meander and take you to secret places.  

If you are timid about designing your space, just spend some time contemplating the area. (I spent 3 years sitting in a hammock-chair observing and contemplating the layout of the “escarpment” I eventually built before I actually started it!) Then just go with your gut. Mother nature will fill the space with colour and insect and bird life, regardless of what the initial layout looks like. And, if you don’t like it – plants can be moved. Easily.  

The Dirt on Dirt – Part 3: Water and Nutrients 

So far in this series on garden soil, I have looked at soil texture, pH, and organic matter in your soil and their impact on plants. In this, the final article in the series, I will discuss soil moisture and nutrients, and why these things even matter. 

Water 

Some of our native plants need dry, well drained soils. At the extreme end are plants like Prickly Pear Cactus (Opuntia spp). Because these plants have evolved strategies to retain water and have lost their mechanisms for eliminating excess water, too much water will cause the plant to drown because it is not able to get enough air to the roots. In cactus, in particular, too much water will lead to rotting roots because they do not have the ability to fight of moisture loving fungi and bacteria.  

We all know that plants need water to grow. How much they need (or will tolerate) depends on a variety of factors, not the least of which is the conditions under which they evolved.  

At the other end of the spectrum are aquatic and semi-aquatic plants. Plants like Soft Bulrush (schoenoplectus tabernaemontani) will quickly desiccate and die if left out of the water because they have no mechanism to retain moisture (such as the thick walled cells often found in plants like cacti). But why don’t they drown? In order to get the necessary oxygen down to the roots that are in waterlogged soil, these plants have specialized cells, called aerenchyma, which form tubes to conduct air down below the water level. 

But most of our native plants fall somewhere between the two extremes. In average garden soil, there will be periods that the soil is very wet, such as after the spring thaw and after a period of rain, and times when the soil is quite dry. The moisture retaining capacity of the soil, as we saw in the first two articles in this series, has to do with soil texture and the amount of organic matter present. And if you grow plants that are suited to the soil conditions in your garden, they will easily tolerate these variations in soil moisture. 

We know plants need water, but what role does water actually play in plant growth. For starters, water is essential for photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is the plant’s superpower – being able to convert water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and sunlight into nutrients for the plant, then discarding the excess oxygen (O2) as a waste product – which is very convenient for oxygen breathers like us. During photosynthesis, water provides the hydrogen (H) atoms required to make glucose (C6H12O6) – the simple sugar that serves as the primary source of energy for the plant. 

Water also dissolves nutrients – both organic and inorganic – in the soil, making them available for uptake by the plant’s roots. It is also the medium through which the glucose and soil nutrients are distributed to various parts of the plant. 

Finally, water also plays a role in the plant’s structure and shape by creating a constant pressure, called turgor, on cell walls. When a plant doesn’t have enough water, the cell walls contract, causing the wilting that we see in plants that need watering. If allowed to remain dry for too long, the cells reach a point where they can no longer reabsorb the water and the plant dies. 

Matching your plants to the appropriate soil moisture can be a tricky task. Fortunately, most of our native plants are very forgiving and will tolerate short periods outside of their moisture comfort zone. After all, we have dry years and wet years, as well as those crazy years than bring a pile of rain followed by two months of drought. If plants couldn’t cope with these vagaries, we’d have very few plants. 

Plant Nutrients 

There are 17 nutrients that are essential for plant growth and these can be divided into two categories: macronutrients – those nutrients that are used in large amounts – and micronutrients -those that are used in small amounts by the plant. The macronutrients hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and carbon contribute to over 95% of a plant’s entire biomass. Micronutrients are present in plant tissue in quantities measured in parts per million. Carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are all absorbed from the air, while the other nutrients (including H in the form of water) are primarily taken up from the soil through the plant’s roots. 

Each of these nutrients plays an important role in the plant’s growth. We’ll first look at the role of the three principle components of fertilizers – Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (N, P & K) – followed by a quick look at the other macronutrients. 

NPK 

Nitrogen is used by the plant to create amino acids, the building blocks of protein, and is used by chlorophyll in photosynthesis to convert sunlight into energy for plant growth, among other roles. Insufficient nitrogen can result in leaf yellowing and stunted growth.  

Nitrogen is a water-soluble element that is primarily available to the plants from soil water in the form of nitrite (NO2-), nitrate (NO3-), or ammonium (NH4+) ions. Bacteria in the soil convert nitrogen gas into ammonia, which plants can use. Lightning also converts atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia and nitrate, which enter the soil with rain. When plants and animals die, or when animals excrete waste, the nitrogen in their organic matter returns to the soil. Compost, which is primarily the excrement of soil organisms, is a great source of nitrogen. 

The primary role of Phosphorus in plants is storage and transfer of energy produced by photosynthesis for growth and reproductive processes. It is necessary for seed germination, photosynthesis, protein formation, flower and fruit formation, and is particularly important for good root development. Without adequate phosphorus, plants will be slow to mature, will have poor flowering, will drop flowers and fruits prematurely, and their growth will be stunted.  

Phosphorus in its mineral form is not readily available to plants – it requires bacteria to convert it to a plant available form. Ideally, soil pH should be in the range of 6-7.5 – soils more acidic or alkaline than this will result in P becoming bound to other elements in the soil and not available for plant use. Chicken and horse manure, bone meal, fish emulsion and rock phosphate (used in the manufacture of organic fertilizers) are all good sources of phosphorus for plants. 

Potassium plays a vital role in photosynthesis and regulates water usage by the plant. It has also been shown to improve disease resistance in plants, improve the size of seeds, and enhance fruit quality. Insufficient K can result in leaf yellowing between the veins of leaves and curled or scorched leaves. Potassium is very mobile in the plant, and plants move it to the younger, needy tissue when it becomes limiting. As a result, potassium deficiency first shows up as a mottled chlorosis of the older leaves and eventually the leaf edges become brown. 

Potassium is mined as Potash (cool fact: the world’s largest potash mines are in Saskatchewan) and wood ash. Manures, compost and other organic materials are also potassium sources, even though the concentration of potassium in them is pretty low, but these materials are typically applied generously enough to contribute a sufficient amount of K. 

The Other Macronutrients 

Sometimes called “secondary nutrients”, the elements of carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) are absorbed from air and water, while Magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca) and sulphur (S) are taken up from the soil. 

Carbon, in addition to its role in the formation of glucose for the plant, is an essential building material that gives strength to cells. Adding organic matter, such as manure or decomposing plant parts (rich in carbon– or the browns in compost), to the soil surrounding growing plants is an effective way to provide C for the plants. 

Hydrogen, made available from water during photosynthesis, in addition to being used to form glucose molecules, plays a key role in plant respiration, and recent research suggests that hydrogen also plays a role in mitigating plant stress as well as promoting root growth. 

Oxygen is used by plants in cellular respiration – to break down food molecules and release energy for growth. In addition, the amount of oxygen available to a plant’s root cells affects its growth rate, water and nutrient uptake, as well fruit yield and quality. 

Magnesium plays a critical role in the production of chlorophyll and is a key driver in photosynthesis. It is also involved in the transportation of carbohydrates from leaves to actively growing tissues of plant roots, shoots and reproductive organs. A deficiency of Mg can reduce root or shoot growth, and potentially seed weight, and can appear as yellow bands between the leaf veins. Although Mg is normally sufficient in most garden soils, if necessary, supplemental Mg can be added through compost, Epsom salts (magnesium sulfate), or dolomitic lime.  

Calcium is an important structural component of cell walls. It is necessary for cell growth and division, and influences water movement in cells. In some plants, calcium is required for the uptake of nitrogen. Calcium is found naturally in most limestone-based soils but can be supplemented with crushed eggshells, ground oyster shell or dolomite lime. Calcium can also help to neutralize acidic soils. If Mg levels are sufficient in the soil, adding extra calcium could lead to soil toxicity and cause further problems. If in doubt get a soil test done. 

Sulphur also plays a key role in photosynthesis and the formation of chlorophyll, and in the production of plant proteins. It is also a great tool to help acidify soils for those acid loving plants like blueberries. Sulphur deficiency can resemble N deficiency – leaves can become light green or pale yellow due to the lack of chlorophyll production. Manure, compost, and decomposing plant matter are all sources of sulfur for the garden. 

To learn more about nutrients (and nutrient deficiencies), check out the following websites, or simply google the subject. 

https://nsnewfarmer.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/02/Nutrient-Deficiency-Guide.pdf
https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2024-08/az1106.pdf

Summary 

Most soil conditions across the world can provide plants adapted to that climate and soil with sufficient nutrition for a complete life cycle, without the addition of nutrients as fertilizer. In fact, here in the southern Great Lakes region, we are blessed, for the most part, with great nutrient rich soils. When growing native plants, adding additional fertilizers or compost will often simply result in tall, lanky plants that fall over in the garden. And, speaking from experience, it can take several years for the excess nutrients to be used up. So unless you are trying to grow plants in an industrial wasteland, it is highly unlikely that you will need to add extra nutrients to a native plant garden. The deep roots of many of our native species are able to tap the depths of the soil and find all that they need. 

But it is also important to do your homework on the moisture needs of the plants you are growing, and plant those with high moisture needs together and those that like it drier separately. In this way you will greatly increase your success in the garden, and provide habitat and food for many insects and for those that rely on them. 

Happy Native Plant Gardening. 

The dirt on dirt (aka soil) – Part 2  

Beyond Sand, Silt and Clay – Organic Matter, Loam, Soil pH and other magic 

Last month I wrote about how to determine your soil texture. This month I’d like to discuss some of the other components of soil and what they mean for growing native plants (or other plants, for that matter).  

Organic Matter 

Organic matter (OM) in the soil refers to that part of the soil that is derived from decomposing or decomposed plant or animal material. This may be in the form of animal feces or simply the byproduct of microbial action on once-living materials.  

Organic matter is important in the garden soil because it is a key source of nutrients. Most soil organic matter originates from plant tissue. Most plant residues contain 60-90% moisture but the dry matter that remains is made up primarily of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and small amounts of sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium. Although these nutrients are found in small quantities, they are very important for plant growth and health. 

In fact, because it is primarily from plant tissues, organic matter contains pretty much all the nutrients that new plants will need, effectively recycling those nutrients. In addition, organic matter can hold onto moisture after a rainfall (or spring thaw), keeping that moisture available for new plant growth. Decaying plant and animal material can also help the soil warm up faster in the spring.  

Certain plants (often shade loving plants that evolved on the forest floor) require high levels of organic matter in the soil. They have evolved without the capacity to easily extract nutrients and moisture from soils that have little or no OM.  

Adding mulch to your garden, whether it be from tree leaves you rake onto the flowerbeds in the fall or from wood chips or chopped straw you spread through the garden, is a great way to maintain nutrient levels and keep the soil moist. A good layer of mulch can also help roots to stay cool in the heat of the summer and prevent the plants from drying out too fast.  

(Although I have no technical support for my assumptions, it is my gut feeling that the type of organic material you add should be appropriate to the type of plants you are growing. For instance, wood chips and decaying leaves are perfect for a shade garden. Those plants evolved with the nutrients that come from fallen leaves and branches and the organisms that break them down. Plants that evolved in prairies – usually most of our sun-loving garden plants – on the other hand, evolved with grasses and using chopped straw would, in my mind, be a much better option as a mulch. I use this strategy in my own gardens and so far it seems to be working well.

Loam 

In last month’s article we saw that loam is the term given to a soil texture that is a well-balanced mix of sand, silt and clay. If you recall, Sand is made up of ground minerals and rocks that range in size from 2 mm down to 0.05 mm in diameter, Silt particles are between 0.05 and 0.002 mm in diameter and Clay particles are extremely small – less than 0.002 mm in diameter.  

Having loam soil, a nice mixture of these particle sizes, is often thought of as the “ideal” garden soil because the sand particles provide air space for the roots and allow excess water to drain away, the clay helps to hold on to water better so that plant roots won’t dry out, and the silt fills in the rest of the space. Most plants, except for some that evolved and adapted to extreme soil textures, will do well in loam soils. It’s kind of the “one size fits all” of soil textures.  

That doesn’t mean that if your soil is sandy-loam, or clay-loam or one of the other soil textures that are on the periphery of the loam classification (see the soil triangle, below), that these are bad. Many plants will do quite well in these soil types, too. The only time you may find an issue is if your soil is pure sand, pure clay or pure silt – then you will be somewhat restricted in what you can grow.  

Soil Triangle – See last months article on how to read and use the triangle

Amending your clay with sand, or sand with clay, can sometimes help, especially if your garden area is small and your soil isn’t too extreme, but this can be an expensive proposition. Sometimes it’s better to accept what you have for soil and, rather than strive for an ideal loamy soil, simply grow the plants that are adapted to your soil type.  

Soil pH 

Soil pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of your soil and is measured on a scale from 0 to 14, with 7 being neutral. Lower numbers indicate more acidic soil, while higher numbers indicate more alkaline soil. Most plants do well when the soil pH is between 6.2 and 6.8. 

NOTE: pH, which is always written with a lower-case p and an upper-case H, stands for “potential of Hydrogen” and is a unit of measurement that indicates how much Hydrogen (H) is available and how active the H ions are. pH is measured on a logarithmic scale, but that level of chemistry is way beyond the scope of this article. 

The more acidic your soil, the more difficult it is for plants to absorb nutrients such as phosphorus, nitrogen and potash. If your soil becomes too acidic, some elements – such as aluminum and manganese – become readily available and can reach levels that are toxic to most plants (usually at pH levels below 5.0). 

Whether your soil is acidic or alkaline is often a factor of the rock from which your soil was formed, and changing soil pH is possible, but usually not practical on a whole-garden scale. 

If you have soil that is acidic, you can raise the pH by adding ground agricultural limestone (or wood ash, or ground eggshells, etc.) to the soil. The calcium and magnesium in these elements will help to neutralize the soil’s acidity. But this is not a once-and-done option – you will need to monitor your soil’s pH and repeat the process as necessary.   

To lower the pH for plants that like acidic soils (blueberries, for instance), you can add elemental sulphur, aluminum sulphate or even vinegar or sulfuric acid. But do your research first – the choice of which material you use will depend on how fast or extreme of a change in pH you need. But because of the nature of soil and the effects of rainfall and other factors, this is also a process that requires constant repetition. If you have acid-loving plants, you may be better off planting them in large planters with special acidic soil instead. You can buy such soil, often labeled as soil for azaleas and rhododendrons, in most garden centers.  

Summary 

The amount of organic matter in your soil, along with your soil texture and pH, can have a great influence on which plants you grow and how well they will do. Next month, in the final part of this series I’ve called “The Dirt on Dirt”, I’ll discuss the role of water and nutrients in your garden, and we’ll look at whether fertilizing your native plants is necessary, or even a good thing. 

Until then, happy native plant gardening. 

The dirt on dirt (aka soil) – Part 1 – Soil Texture 

Let me preface this piece with the caveat that I am not trained as a soil scientist (though I did take a couple of university soils courses many years ago). Nevertheless, as a gardener I am always working with soil, and I’ve been curious enough to do some more research over the years.  

In any good book on growing plants, you are likely to come across terms such as clay-loam, soil alkalinity, humus, topsoil, etc. Understanding what some of these terms actually mean, and how they relate to your gardening, will help you to be more successful at growing your native (or other) plants. 

First off, some definitions. 

Texture: refers to the size of the soil particles (this is not the clumps of soil you may see in your garden, but the elemental particles that make them up). Soil scientists have determined that there are 3 basic soil particle sizes – Sand, Silt and Clay – and these combine to form 12 soil types that you would typically see in gardens (more on these later).  

Sand is made up of ground minerals and rocks that are rounded or irregular in shape. These range in size from 2 mm down to 0.05 mm in diameter and feel gritty when rubbed between your fingers. 

Silt particles are between 0.05 and 0.002 mm in diameter and feel a bit like flour when dry. 

Clay particles are extremely small – less than 0.002 mm in diameter. In fact, they are so small that you can really only see the individual particles through an electron microscope. We often refer to clay soils as “heavy”. (One suggestion for this term is that plowing clay soils takes 2 to 4 times the tractor power to pull the plow through it as in “light” sandy soils.) 

The Implications of Texture 

If your soil is mostly sand, you cannot form a ball of it when it is wet – it will just crumble and fall apart. This is because the large particle size of sand results in large air gaps between the particles and thus water doesn’t have a strong enough bond to hold the particles together. Although these gaps allow water to enter easily, it also lets the water flow right through. As a result, sandy soils dry out quickly.  

Some plants have adapted to sandy soils – Big Bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) and Prairie Smoke (Geum triflorum) are just two examples – and thus will typically not do well in wetter areas with heavier soils. By the same token, plants that have evolved in wetter areas, especially in clay-rich soils, are unlikely to survive in sandy soils. This is, in part, because without moisture retaining mechanisms, their roots will simply dry out. 

At the other end of the spectrum, clay particles are so small that the air spaces between them are extremely tiny. Often, water will just puddle on top of clay soils and take ages to drain away. (This is why they use clay to line ponds and landfills.) However, water will eventually soak into the pores and because of the physics of water molecules and soil particles, the clay will actually “hold onto” the water for a much longer time.  

Anybody who has walked through wet clay can attest to the fact that wet (even damp) clay sticks tightly to boots, shovels, etc. One impact of this characteristic is that clay soils readily compact and compacted soils do not allow roots to penetrate easily. 

To test if you have clay soil, wet a small lump of it and press it between your finger and thumb and try to form a ribbon of soil. In pure clay, the small clay particles will stick tightly together and you should be able to press out a ribbon a few centimeters long. This Ribbon Test is used by soil scientists to get a quick idea of the soil texture. 

Just as some plants have evolved in sandy soils, so too have some evolved in areas of heavy clay. Cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis) and Swamp Milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) are two that come to mind. 

Everything in Between 

Soil scientists have developed a Soil Texture Triangle which, once you learn how to read it, will allow you to identify which of the 12 soil types you have based on the clay, silt and sand composition of your soil. 

Let’s say you get your soil tested and it comes back that you have 45% sand, 20% clay and 35% silt. Where these 3 lines cross on the triangle indicates your named soil type – in this case, loam. (The angle of the numbers indicates which line to follow.) 

If you want to determine your own soil texture, one method you can use is what is called a jar test

  • Start by getting a shovel full of soil from your garden (you can take samples from different areas, if you want, to get a general feel for your entire yard though it is unlikely that there will be significant differences in an area as small as a town lot). Make sure you take your sample at least six inches (15 cm) down – not just off the surface – as you want to get a complete picture of your soil.  
  • Sift your soil to remove debris, rocks and large organic matter and fill a clear jar about 1/3 full of this “cleaned” soil.  
  • Add water almost to the top of the jar and add a small amount of water softener or liquid dish soap. Put the lid on the jar and shake vigorously for a few minutes until the soil/water mixture is a uniform slurry. Let the mixture stand for 48-72 hours for the soil to settle out (it will separate out into layers with sand at the bottom and clay at the top).  
  • After the mixture has set for a couple of minutes, you can mark the side of the jar with a black marker. This represents the sand component. 
  • After the mixture has set for about two hours, mark the side of the jar. This represents the silt layer. 
  • Finally, after 2-3 days, the clay will finally have settled out and you can mark that level. 
  • Using a ruler, measure the depth that each layer makes up. To calculate the percentage of each element, divide the height of that element by the total height of the soil in the jar.

With this information, you can now determine which plants will like the soil you have in your garden. After that, you can determine light and moisture levels to narrow down your selection. 

Values from my yard’s soil sample: Total soil = 42 mm

Sand = 21/42 = 50%, Silt = 15/42 = 36%, Clay = 6/42 = 14%

Reading these values of the Triangle, we find that my soil is classified as loam (and very close to being a sandy loam).

Next Month – Beyond Sand, Silt and Clay – Organic Matter, Loam, Soil pH and other magic 

Keeping an Edge 

Last month I wrote about preparing your lawn for a new garden. In that article I discussed some of the strategies I’ve tried (and a few I haven’t) for removing the sod. This month I’m going to look at a few techniques for making your garden edges look more formal so that your lawn doesn’t look like it’s simply being neglected. This is partly because on social media there have been a number of postings recently about “tidy” gardens (and the issues that arise when neighbours think your garden isn’t tidy enough). I have used most of these techniques or have friends who have used them. Hopefully this month’s article will give you some useful ideas to try. 

Three distinct edgings are seen in this photo – red = v-trench, yellow = plastic edging, white = pea stone

In the Beginning 

In my early gardening days with native plants, I had a couple of relatively small flower beds. Using plastic garden edging was both affordable and easy. The nice thing about the plastic edging is that it provides a nice, clean edge with virtually no maintenance after it’s installed.  

But all plastic edging is not created equal. The small (usually 3-4”) lightweight stuff is, in my opinion, a waste of money as it will work out of the soil with frost heave in only a couple of years. Go for the heavy duty stuff – 5” or more – and you should be good for years to come.  

But even the heavy stuff has issues. I find that on sharp curves the plastic will work up out of the soil. And it doesn’t take much to catch it with the lawnmower and then you have a shredded piece of edging. It also doesn’t work that well if you have any kind of topographic variation to your lawn. It may snake around curves nicely, but it definitely doesn’t handle the up and down curves of the ground.  

Dig a Trench 

Almost all my flowerbeds over the last 10 years have had no hard edging at all. Instead, I dig a V-shaped trench (about 3-4” deep) around the perimeter of the garden. In my sandy loam soil, this is a pretty easy trench to dig. 

One of the big advantages of this is that as your garden expands (as mine invariably do), I simply dig the perimeter trench a little further out. Another advantage is that topography makes little difference – your trench simply follows the lay of the land. 

Unlike plastic edging, however, the v-trench requires annual maintenance (at best). Grass grows in, seeds fall into the trench and sprout, soil gets trampled, and before you know it there is little evidence of a clean edge. To me, though, the little time it takes to re-dig the trench is worth it for the flexibility it offers.  

Another drawback to the v-trench edge is that you can’t really get the lawnmower close enough to trim the grass – unless there is room in the bed itself to run the lawnmower wheels (usually ok for the first year or two, but eventually my flowers push right to the edge of the garden). As a consequence, I have to take the grass trimmer to all my beds that are trenched. This is just one more chore to add to the gardening tasks. 

Fill in the Trench 

A technique I was introduced to this year definitely warrants some further investigation by me as it seems to provide the best of both methods.  

A good friend digs a U shaped trench about 4-6” wide and just as deep along the edge of her gardens then proceeds to fill the trench with limestone screenings. She then packs the screenings in with a tamper.  

Not only does this make a clean edge to the flower bed, but it also provides a smooth surface to run the lawnmower wheel along.  Weeds like Creeping Charlie will grow over it, but very few roots will actually penetrate the stone screenings – which is great for things like twitch (quack) grass. If you want to keep plants IN the bed, too, you can always dig the trench a little deeper and even your goldenrods won’t escape. 

Another advantage is that, like the v-trench, topography of your lawn won’t matter.  

The only drawbacks that I’ve noticed so far is that some weed seeds will grow (mostly lawn grasses) in the stone dust, but these do pull out easily if tackled early. Another challenge is that the edge is semi-permanent – it will be a bit of a job if you need to move the border, though a sharp shovel after a good rain would do the job easily enough. 

Make it Permanent 

A couple of other options would be to make the edging out of poured cement instead of stone screenings. NOTHING will grow through it and there will be no maintenance for many years. Of course, don’t expect to move the border any time soon. 

Rather than pouring concrete, you could also dig your trench and lay in concrete blocks or bricks. These can make a clean edge while being a lot easier to move if needed.  

The friend who uses the limestone screenings plans to try using “universal curb” blocks for the straight-line edge of a couple of her beds this fall. These concrete blocks are 3” wide X 8” deep X 39” long and apparently weigh just over 85 lbs each. And they aren’t cheap. We’ll see if they work as expected. 

Make it for Show 

Of course, your garden edging can be mostly for show. In other words, you can install some low cost, low profile fencing along the edge to make your garden “deliberate”, even if the bed is a tad messy. I’m a huge proponent of the lazy gardening method and prefer not to clean up stalks and leaves till late spring when most of the insects are out of their winter homes. For that reason, anything that helps to give the appearance that the garden mess is purposeful (and not just neglect) is worth a try. 

Fences come in all sizes, colours and configurations and there’s probably one for every budget. But if this is for a front yard, make sure that your fence doesn’t obstruct sightlines or violate any municipal bylaws. 

Happy native plant gardening. 

Hate mowing lawns? Get rid of the grass! 

Most people reading this article will have, at one time or another, faced the prospect of removing a section of lawn in order to create a new garden – whether that be specifically for a native flower bed, for a vegetable patch, or for some other good reason. Today I want to discuss some of the pros and cons of the various methods of getting rid of the grass that I have experienced in my quest to grow something besides lawn. In particular I will look at the following 5 methods… 

  1. Herbicides 
  1. The “Lasagna” Method 
  1. Tarp 
  1. Solarization 
  1. Removing the Sod (with shovel or mechanical sod lifter) 

Herbicide (Glyphosate) 

Let me start this section with the confession that, in the early days of gardening, I DID use RoundUp (i.e. Glyphosate) to kill off the sod, but I no longer use this method (see *Note at the end of this article on my feelings about Glyphosate).  

Roundup is very effective at killing sod. It is also very easy. The best part of it is that it is relatively quick – spray your patch of grass this weekend, and next weekend start lifting the dead sod (it can take up to 2 weeks for some of the plants to turn brown, but they will be dead. Glyphosate is drawn down into the roots of the plant via the sap stream in the leaves, where it prevents the roots from absorbing nutrients from the soil. The big advantage is that if you don’t dig out all the roots, it won’t matter.) 

However, RoundUp is expensive, hard to get (in some cases), and carries a huge stigma. It also has the distinct disadvantage of potentially killing off good plants through spray drift. Another drawback is that if you accidentally step on a sprayed patch, you leave footprints of dead grass across your lawn as you walk back to the house. (Ask me how I know this – d’oh!) That makes it pretty obvious that you have used Glyphosate to anyone who visits (at least until the dead spots fill back in). 

And, although the sod is now dead, you still have to rototill it up or dig it out before you can plant your new garden. I would only recommend this method if your patch of lawn is heavily infested with bindweed or some other equally deep-rooted invasive species that you won’t be able to easily remove with the other techniques. 

The Lasagna Method 

The lasagna method of gardening is often used in the preparation of vegetable gardens. This is because the materials used will create a rich, moisture retentive garden soil that may be too rich for native plants. However, if you are developing a garden in a new subdivision where all the topsoil has been removed, or on land that was once a gravel pit, this method might work for you. 

The trick with the lasagna method is to lay down a layer of cardboard or newspaper first. This helps to smother the grass (these materials will decompose in a year or less and become part of the soil). You then cover it with layers (like a lasagna) of mulch, lawn clippings, compost, etc. to make a rich, fluffy soil to plant into. The process can take a year for the layers to break down enough to become soil, so it is a long term process. 

A great advantage to this method is that you don’t have to physically remove the sod. And you can plant right into the decaying mulch. (Don’t do this if the mulch is actively working and is hot – you could burn off the sensitive plant roots.) 

The big disadvantage is that it can take the better part of the year to decompose enough to safely plant into – depending on weather, depth of mulch, etc. 

Tarps, Old Carpet or Cardboard 

Similar to the lasagna method, in that this method starves the sod (and weeds) of light and moisture, a tried and true way to kill grass is to cover it with some form of dark barrier. The main drawback to this method, if you’re an impatient gardener, is that it can take months to ensure the grass and weeds are all killed.  

Cardboard will work, though it might be a tad of a challenge to keep it from blowing around or getting shifted from foot traffic. Adding some mulch to weigh it down brings you back to the lasagna method but, if your land is stony, you could use rocks to keep it in place. Cardboard will eventually deteriorate, and if you don’t plan to leave it in place and plant through it (cutting holes for each plant), then it can be pretty messy to lift for disposal. 

I have used old carpet – someone had put rolls of it out for garbage pick up and I just scooped it up and took it home. If there is a carpet store near you, they will likely be glad to give you carpet they’ve ripped out of someone’s house – it will save them from taking it to the dump. The carpet was quite effective at killing off the grass under a large maple tree and it did not have to be weighed down with anything as it was quite heavy enough to resist any unwanted movement – especially after it had been rained on. The hard part was cutting up the old, smelly, rotting carpet to dispose of it – small chunks at a time – with my household garbage once it had done its job.  

Tarps work well. They have the advantage of being lightweight and easy to handle, and they come in various sizes (and colours). They do need to be weighted down (with stones or bricks) or pegged. The drawback is that they are pricey and UV rays will eventually break down the plastic if it is left in full sun for the better part of a year.  

A much more frugal option is to go to your local lumber yard and ask for the plastic tarps that cover the lumber piles. These are normally just thrown in the garbage when a new shipment of lumber comes in. My local lumber yard chuckled when I asked if I could have a couple, but they gave them to me for free. If you’re lucky, you may get some that don’t even have rips or holes in them. And the bonus: you can cut them to fit any shape garden without worrying about ruining a perfectly good tarp. 

Like other methods of smothering the grass, you will probably have to leave the covering on the lawn for several months to effectively kill unwanted weeds. Some of the very persistent plants (like bindweed, etc) may even survive tarping – especially if they are well established in your lawn. 

Solarizing 

Solarizing is similar to the tarp method, but with the use of clear plastic sheets that magnify the sun’s rays to kill the grass. Proponents claim this can effectively kill off the sod in a couple of months. It is a method I have NOT tried, so I only have their word for it. Nor do I know how effective it is on those deep rooted weeds like bindweed. But if your future garden area is small, you can buy clear plastic (sold as vapour barrier in the hardware store) at a relatively reasonable price. 

Shovel, Mechanical Sod Lifter 

My preferred method of sod removal these days is a flat-bladed shovel. This is because I enjoy the physical aspect of digging, I have a flat-blade shovel (so it doesn’t cost me anything), and my soil is a nice sandy loam that is easy to dig.  

With my shovel, I simply dig a small v-shaped trench around the perimeter of the new garden bed, then shove the blade under the grass and flip it up. I then toss the sod clump into the wheelbarrow to be dumped (grass side down) in a back corner of the yard where the grass then dies – leaving a pile of topsoil for use when and where I need it. The drawback is that this is a slow process and can be very hard on the back. The good part is that you can dig out any deep roots as you come across them.  

I’ve never tried an actual sod lifter, either a manual one a powered one, but really these are just more sophisticated versions of the flat shovel.  You can usually rent manual lifters or powered sod lifters, depending on your budget and the size of the garden area, at most of your typical tool rental places. 

The End Results 

Ideally your efforts will result in a garden that is free of grass and weeds, ready to plant into. You may have to rototill if you are in heavy clay soil or you may do like I did and simply add a layer of woodchip mulch to keep moisture and soil organisms in place, thereby letting nature loosen the soil for you. In the end, you should have a wonderful new garden bed that is ready to go. 

Happy Native Plant Gardening. 

PS – My Thoughts on Herbicide Use (this may be controversial for some!) 

*Note – I do not have a problem with the judicious use of Glyphosate, in small amounts, for very specific plants – especially for invasive, poisonous or extremely deeply rooted plants (like bindweed). Round up is broken down in the soil by soil bacteria within a few days. The bacteria use it as a food source (Kanissary, et al., 2019). “Glyphosate’s half-life in surface waters after forestry spraying in Manitoba was less than 24 hours. In soils, glyphosate undergoes microbial degradation to the metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which is slowly degraded to carbon dioxide and simple inorganic compounds” (Gov’t of Canada, 2015). 

For those who believe salt, vinegar and dish soap are a better option, I suggest you do some unbiased research. That home remedy will kill off the above-ground part of the vegetation only (it is a contact herbicide and works by killing whatever it comes in contact with), but not the roots, so most perennials will just re-grow. In the meantime, you will have poisoned the soil for microbes, earthworms, etc., killing off those important soil fauna (Enroth, 2020). If you believe that this is a chemical free way to kill plants, remember that salt is the chemical sodium chloride and vinegar is acetic acid, and in sufficient quantities to burn off plants, these chemicals will also kill soil micro- and macrofauna. Research has also shown that acetic acid in great enough concentration to effectively kill plants (5-10%) is “incredibly harmful to humans. Any contact with the skin and eyes causes irreversible corrosion and damage, meaning gloves and goggles are a must when using vinegar herbicides” (Enroth, 2020). In fact, even at these high concentrations of acetic acid it is really only effective at killing very young (less than 2 week old) seedlings and some young annual species (Smitth-Feola & Gill, 2022). 

Equally as problematic, it will kill any frogs or toads it happens to land on (Enroth, 2020). For herbicides to be approved in the first place, they have to be shown to target only plants, usually by attacking specific plant parts at the cellular level, like the chloroplast which animals and other organisms lack. Neither salt nor vinegar are approved as herbicides because they impact both plants and animals that they come into contact with (Pelliccia, 2024). A good friend accidentally spritzed a toad while using the concoction. She noticed right away and washed the toad off, but it died anyway.  

I am not condoning the wholesale use of herbicides to remove lawn. Quite the contrary. But if it is used carefully and in small quantities, it can be a very safe and effective solution for problematic weeds. 

References 

Enroth, C. 2020. Home Horticultural Remedies. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Illinois Extension. https://extension.illinois.edu/blogs/good-growing/2020-05-22-home-horticultural-remedies  

Government of Canada. 2015. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document – Glyphosate. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-guideline-technical-document-glyphosate.html  

Kanissery, R, Gairhe, B, Kadyampakeni, D, Batuman, O and Alferez, F. 2019. Glyphosate: Its Environmental Persistence and Impact on Crop Health and Nutrition. Plants. doi: 10.3390/plants8110499 

Pellicia, S. 2024. Salt & Vinegar on Weeds? Save it for the Chips! Washington State University/Washington Dept of Natural Resources. https://foreststewardshipnotes.wordpress.com/2024/06/12/salt-vinegar-on-weeds-save-it-for-the-chips/  

Smith-Feola, D. and Gill, S. 2022. Vinegar: An Alternative to Glyphosate? University of Maryland Extension, https://extension.umd.edu/resource/vinegar-alternative-glyphosate/  

Native Plant Gardens: Naturalized or Formal – Which is Better?

We all garden to our own aesthetic. For some, green, sterile lawns of shortly mown grass is a beautiful sight. Others see beauty in lush beds of exotic (and often invasive) flowers, shrubs and vines. Increasingly, though, especially since Doug Tallamy’s groundbreaking work (if you haven’t read his book “Bringing Nature Home”, I urge you to do so), people are adding native species to the mix. Some are going so far as to remove all the non-native species and plant only native (and near-native) plants in their yards. They are doing this in an effort to provide food and habitat for the butterflies (and their caterpillars), bees, fireflies and other insects that are so important to a healthy environment.

But what gardening style is best for native plants? Today I will wax a little philosophical on this topic and offer some commentary on the ways we can garden with native species. There is no right or wrong way to do it – it all boils down to what YOU prefer.

The Formal Approach

At one extreme is what I call the Formal Gardens approach. This is often the direction taken by folks who have gardened for years with non-native species, in a Victorian style of gardening.

These gardens typically consist of distinct flower beds with low growing plants in the front and tall ones at the back. They are usually well weeded, with a layer of mulch (often wood chips) on the ground. Flowers and grasses are grown in distinct clusters within the beds. The general appearance is that of a “well tended garden” and displays a strict control over nature.

The big advantage to this style of gardening is that you are unlikely to raise the ire of neighbours who know nothing about native plant gardening, and consequently you are unlikely to get a visit from a bylaw officer telling you to mow down the “weeds”.

In my southwestern Ontario garden, this is definitely the way I started (and to a certain extent, still garden). But my gardens are designed to teach – I have over 300 species of native plants, all clearly labeled so that visitors can see what the plants might look like in their gardens. I leave wide, grassed pathways so that groups can easily wander to observe the plants and easily view the different species.  These semi-formal beds make for a park-like setting and, in my opinion, make for a very relaxing back yard experience.

The “Naturalized” Approach

At the other end of the spectrum is the “toss the seeds and let them grow” approach. After all, this is how Mother Nature does it. This method of gardening can seem very messy to the uninitiated and is the method most likely to upset neighbours – especially those who love their short-cropped lawns. However, with the right mix of plants, this natural approach can provide fabulous continuous colour and great year-round structure in the garden, and can potentially create the most habitat for pollinators and other insects.  For those who grew up on formal gardens, it can take a while to wrap our heads around the value these “messy” gardens provide.

Something in Between

I confess that as my formal style gardens mature and fill with lots of self-seeded plants, the formal beds increasingly take on the messier look of a naturalized garden. And I’m good with that. Rather than seeing mess (as I once did), I now see habitat. And I also see lots of butterflies, moths, bees, wasps and other beneficial insects. And now, when plants flop over in the bed, I don’t rush in and tie them up. Instead, I’m more apt to just let them flop.  I find that as I get older, “lazy” gardening appeals more and more. (Also, with age, I worry less about what my neighbours think!)

Mass Planting

Whether you choose formal or “natural”, one strategy that can make for an impressive display is to make sure you plant LOTS of each species together. Not only does this increase the impact of the flowers when they’re in bloom, but it also makes it easier for specialist pollinators to collect lots of pollen from their preferred plants.

It’s Up to You!

Regardless of whether you want to garden with formal beds, with wild and natural, or somewhere between, the key thing is to continue gardening and introducing more native plants into your flower beds. How the plants are arranged is entirely up to you, but our insects, birds and other wildlife depend on us growing native species. (You can read more about this in last month’s article – “Why Native Plants”.)

Happy native plant gardening.

P.S.

If you are concerned about bylaw officers telling you to cut down your “weeds”, then please get involved in a very important movement spearheaded by well-known native plant author Lorraine Johnson, the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects, the Canadian Wildlife Federation, the David Suzuki Foundation and the Ecological Design Lab to get by-laws updated. You can check out the open letter to municipalities, and offer you support via this link.